Prompt: To what extent have you found it possible, in your consideration of literary works, to separate the individual from his or her public role? In your answer you should refer to any two or three works you have studied.
In Oedipus and Blood Wedding we see both Oedipus and the Bride attempt to hold their public roles; however, both characters struggle with their own personal beliefs. Oedipus clearly states his public role to the people in Thebes after hearing what needs to be done to save the city of Thebes, "I am the land's avenger by all rights, and Apollo's champion too." (167). In this passage, we see Oedipus take on the responsibility of solving Laius' murder because the people of Thebes look to him as the king and supreme ruler. Creon acknowledges Oedipus' public role when he denies wanting to overtake Oedipus, "But if I wore the crown...there'd be many painful duties to perform, hardly to my taste" (193). By describing Oedipus' public role as "painful" the reader can imagine how highly valued Oedipus is to the city of Thebes. However, though his public role idolizes Oedipus we have to realize that he is not supreme and has his own flaws. Therefore, his individual self is separated from his public role as we see his flaws begin to emerge. When speaking to Tiresias, Oedipus asks, "Parents--who? Wait...who is my father?" (184). From here we see that Oedipus is struggling with his own origins. So what we see as Oedipus' individual self devalues how we judge his public role because as we see the internal struggles Oedipus goes through we start to see that he is not the public figure that the society depicts him as. Similarly, this deception in character is seen in the Bride in Blood Wedding. In Blood Wedding a woman is expected to be quiet in her society. This can be seen as Father describes the bride, "What can I tell you about my daughter? She makes bread at three, while the morning star is still shining. She never talks--soft as wool. She embroiders all kinds of embroidery. And she can cut through a rope with her teeth." (31). Father lists a bunch of expectations that are expected of brides. This is how the public views woman and the role that they should play in society. However, the Bride acts differently than what is expected of her. Therefore, her individual role has no connections to her public one. The bride shows how she is different by saying, "Because I ran away with another man, I ran away! (Anguished) You would have gone, too!" (101). The way the bride acts is very different than what is expected of her. She disobeyed the expectations that were put upon her.
To answer the question, in each play a public role is established that sets the expectations of the character. However, their individual self is very different than what is expected of them. So this idealized image that the public sees slowly degrades as the characters develop. It is very easy to separate the individual and the public role. Furthermore, this motif of their public role vs their individual actions carries onto the image of deception that occurs in the plays. The characters are deceiving each other by presenting themselves in one way and acting in another.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Blood Wedding #2
Prompt: Stylistic techniques (imagery, figurative language, sensory detail)
I'm not sure if this counts as a "stylistic technique" but I would like to focus on the image of water in Blood Wedding. We first see the image of water in Act I when the Neighbor speaks to Mother, "The children who take water out to the reapers are black from the sun" (16). Reapers are defined as a person who reaps (to cut, gather, or take). Therefore, to take something to a reaper means to give up and lose something. From this it is said that the children will become "black from the sun." This has a negative meaning because to turn black from the sun could indicate that one has been spending too much time under the heat. Additionally, this can be connected to being burned because when something is burned only black ashes remain. So from this sentence we can see a warning that water is a dangerous substance that if given away can have negative impacts. It can also show a sacrifice because the children are willingly giving these things up.
This idea is continued into the the next scene when the Mother-In-Law and Wife are reciting the lullaby. In it it says, "The horse does not want water" (17). This shows that even though water is essential for us to survive, to refuse it means that there maybe negative connotations to the word. Further on into the lullaby it says, "The horse begins to drink[...]The horse begins to cry" (27). Like the neighbor quote, when water is consumed negative outcomes appear. In this quote when the horse begins to drink, it also begins to cry or show sorrow for its action. Another way to look at it is that the horse does not have control over its action. It is instinct to thirst and drink even if one desires not to. Therefore, water can be a symbol of a renewed life because it is essential to drink to survive.
In the previous two examples we have seen water in a sort of idolized positions because it is given power to bring negative impacts and control others. Towards the end of the second act Mother states after finding the Bride gone, "Honorable women throw themselves into the water, the decent ones" (77). We once again see this idea of water being a idolized, special object. In it it shows that only "honorable women" should have the ability to sacrifice themselves into the water. This is significant because we can connect this back to the horse example and see that both show how water is a symbol of something that has larger control and power over others.
Though I haven't read enough of the play to really understand what the symbol of water represents, I would like to believe that the image is represented in a way to show that it stands for something that has more control over a situation than the most "honorable" of people. And that it will be significant because this "water" can determine the outcome of a situation, whether negative or positive.
I'm not sure if this counts as a "stylistic technique" but I would like to focus on the image of water in Blood Wedding. We first see the image of water in Act I when the Neighbor speaks to Mother, "The children who take water out to the reapers are black from the sun" (16). Reapers are defined as a person who reaps (to cut, gather, or take). Therefore, to take something to a reaper means to give up and lose something. From this it is said that the children will become "black from the sun." This has a negative meaning because to turn black from the sun could indicate that one has been spending too much time under the heat. Additionally, this can be connected to being burned because when something is burned only black ashes remain. So from this sentence we can see a warning that water is a dangerous substance that if given away can have negative impacts. It can also show a sacrifice because the children are willingly giving these things up.
This idea is continued into the the next scene when the Mother-In-Law and Wife are reciting the lullaby. In it it says, "The horse does not want water" (17). This shows that even though water is essential for us to survive, to refuse it means that there maybe negative connotations to the word. Further on into the lullaby it says, "The horse begins to drink[...]The horse begins to cry" (27). Like the neighbor quote, when water is consumed negative outcomes appear. In this quote when the horse begins to drink, it also begins to cry or show sorrow for its action. Another way to look at it is that the horse does not have control over its action. It is instinct to thirst and drink even if one desires not to. Therefore, water can be a symbol of a renewed life because it is essential to drink to survive.
In the previous two examples we have seen water in a sort of idolized positions because it is given power to bring negative impacts and control others. Towards the end of the second act Mother states after finding the Bride gone, "Honorable women throw themselves into the water, the decent ones" (77). We once again see this idea of water being a idolized, special object. In it it shows that only "honorable women" should have the ability to sacrifice themselves into the water. This is significant because we can connect this back to the horse example and see that both show how water is a symbol of something that has larger control and power over others.
Though I haven't read enough of the play to really understand what the symbol of water represents, I would like to believe that the image is represented in a way to show that it stands for something that has more control over a situation than the most "honorable" of people. And that it will be significant because this "water" can determine the outcome of a situation, whether negative or positive.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Blood Wedding #1
Prompt: To what extent would you agree that plot should be valued more highly than style in the work. In your answer you should refer to two or three works you have studied.
I would argue to say that plot and style are connected. It is through the author's style of writing that allows the reader to understand the plot of what is going on in the play. In Blood Wedding the style of writing is very concise. Whereas, Wild Duck focuses more on descriptions to describe the differences in characters and to further the plot. In Blood Wedding the dialogue for each character is very short and by doing this the author makes it clear the feelings that the character has to what is happening. An example is when Mother speaks to Neighbor about Wife's past:
MOTHER: We all like to know more about anything that can hurt us. Who was he?
NEIGHBOR: Leonardo.
MOTHER: Leonardo who?
NEIGHBOR: Leonardo Felix.
MOTHER: (Getting up) Felix!
Though very few words were used in this passage, Mother's dislike for the Felix family can be clearly shown by the fact that she got up. From this we can understand that the Felix family will be involved in the plot and will most likely have some impact throughout the book. Additionally, because the style of writing is so concise, the reader must focus on the extra stage directions to understand the feelings behind the words stated. Therefore, through this style of writing the reader spends more time understanding the characters and the plot that is being drawn out.
Wild Duck also relies on stage direction to indicate the change in plot; however, the book focuses more on descriptions rather than being to the point. In the beginning of each act there is a paragraph long description of each scene. Through this we can see the difference in characters and how the Ekdal family has fallen since the scandal. Additionally, the dialogue is not very straightforward. This causes the reader to deeply think about what is happening and thus this type of style furthers the reader's understanding of the plot. An example of this is Hjalmar's description to how he will regain the family's name, "I will carry it out, I tell you. There will come a day when--And that's why it's good we got the room rented out, for now I'm more independently fixed. Any man must be that, who's got a mission in life. Poor old white-haired Father--lean on your Hjalmar." (156). Though Ibsen could have easily stated the idea that Hjalmar believes he can regain his family's name in a few words, he instead decides to use more abstract sentences to allow the reader to interpret Hjalmar's intentions. Ibsen mentions renting out a room and Hjalmar's father just to illustrate that Hjalmar wants to be the one that rises his family out of their poor condition.
In both plays the plot of the story is captured through two different styles of writing. Regardless of whether it is concise like Blood Wedding or more descriptive like Wild Duck the style of writing helps further the plot of the story. You cannot describe a story without some type of style to the writing nor can you write a story with a style but with no plot.
I would argue to say that plot and style are connected. It is through the author's style of writing that allows the reader to understand the plot of what is going on in the play. In Blood Wedding the style of writing is very concise. Whereas, Wild Duck focuses more on descriptions to describe the differences in characters and to further the plot. In Blood Wedding the dialogue for each character is very short and by doing this the author makes it clear the feelings that the character has to what is happening. An example is when Mother speaks to Neighbor about Wife's past:
MOTHER: We all like to know more about anything that can hurt us. Who was he?
NEIGHBOR: Leonardo.
MOTHER: Leonardo who?
NEIGHBOR: Leonardo Felix.
MOTHER: (Getting up) Felix!
Though very few words were used in this passage, Mother's dislike for the Felix family can be clearly shown by the fact that she got up. From this we can understand that the Felix family will be involved in the plot and will most likely have some impact throughout the book. Additionally, because the style of writing is so concise, the reader must focus on the extra stage directions to understand the feelings behind the words stated. Therefore, through this style of writing the reader spends more time understanding the characters and the plot that is being drawn out.
Wild Duck also relies on stage direction to indicate the change in plot; however, the book focuses more on descriptions rather than being to the point. In the beginning of each act there is a paragraph long description of each scene. Through this we can see the difference in characters and how the Ekdal family has fallen since the scandal. Additionally, the dialogue is not very straightforward. This causes the reader to deeply think about what is happening and thus this type of style furthers the reader's understanding of the plot. An example of this is Hjalmar's description to how he will regain the family's name, "I will carry it out, I tell you. There will come a day when--And that's why it's good we got the room rented out, for now I'm more independently fixed. Any man must be that, who's got a mission in life. Poor old white-haired Father--lean on your Hjalmar." (156). Though Ibsen could have easily stated the idea that Hjalmar believes he can regain his family's name in a few words, he instead decides to use more abstract sentences to allow the reader to interpret Hjalmar's intentions. Ibsen mentions renting out a room and Hjalmar's father just to illustrate that Hjalmar wants to be the one that rises his family out of their poor condition.
In both plays the plot of the story is captured through two different styles of writing. Regardless of whether it is concise like Blood Wedding or more descriptive like Wild Duck the style of writing helps further the plot of the story. You cannot describe a story without some type of style to the writing nor can you write a story with a style but with no plot.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Tragedy Topic Tracking
What I've been tracking: The contrast between inner and outer and how they are used throughout the book.
There were not many occasions of encountering this motif, so I do not have very much to say. In Oedipus I saw the words "inside" used 3 times. First by Tiresias, "The truth with all its power lives inside me." (405). Second by Oedipus, "what envy lurks inside you!" (435). Third by the chorus, "But the heart inside me sickens, dies as the land dies" (739). And once there was a mention by Oedipus about appearance under the skin, "what a handsome prince you raised--under the skin, what sickness to the core" (1528-1529). In these quotes there seems to be a division between a person's feelings expressed on their outside and inside self. This can be seen through the first 3 quotes. The first one associates "truth" with the inside, the second associates "envy" and the third uses "heart" and "sickens". So what can be seen is that the inside self holds more power than the outside. Tiresias has the ability to tell the truth but he rather hold it within him than to let the power and sadness spread outwards. Similarly, Oedipus accuses Tiresias of holding envy within him to show that he has the intentions of hurting others but does not openly show it. And the chorus references their inside as being sick to show the pain and suffering they receive from watching their land die out.
The Wild Duck uses this motif a few times as well. The first can be seen in the first act when Gregers and Hjalmar speak to each other:
GREGERS: Yes, you do, the outer man hasn't suffered.
HJALMAR: (in a gloomier tone). Ah, but the inner man! Believe me, he has a different look. You know, of course, what misery we've been through, I and my family, since the last time the two of us met. (122).
This scene adds to the themes of deceit and disguise that is used in the book. What we see is that Hjalmar presents himself as the same man that Gregers once remembered as the young vibrant man. However, Hjalmar openly admits that this is a disguise as he says "but the inner man[...]he has a different look". This also adds to Hjalmar's character by showing how he is trying to display himself as better than what he is.
The inner self can also show a cover up of different qualities. Gregers speaks of Gina by saying, "But she, too, surely, in the depths of her being, has something authentic, something sincere" (186). So we see this division between an inner personality and an outer one. In this quote we see Gregers accuse Gina of living a fake lifestyle filled with lies but he says that she still has "something authentic" that can be found "in the depths of her being". This is significant because it shows that there is this idea that every person has a different personality within them and what they portray themselves. This idea is present throughout the book as we see Gregers accuse more people of living an unfaithful life.
Relling also uses this motif of inner and outer. He states to Gregers towards the end of the play, "That's an inside look at him [Hjalmar], this idol you're groveling in front of. [...] you always have to have something to admire that's outside of yourself" (202). By saying this Relling is pointing out the flaws in Gregers by saying that he worships people "outside" of himself and that there is a different person "inside" of Hjalmar. Through this we see that Gregers creates a disguise of other people by seeing them as higher than what they are. There is also the division between a person is seen as and what their "inside" self is like. Through this we see that how one portrays oneself or is perceived is different than the amount they can tolerate inside of themselves.
Through the symbols of inside and outside in the two plays we see that there is a division between an inside personality and an outer one. Therefore, throughout these plays we see how there is a difference between how one portrays him/herself and how one is perceived by themselves. This is important because throughout the two plays there is this sense that there is deceit between the characters and lies drive the conflicts that come about.
There were not many occasions of encountering this motif, so I do not have very much to say. In Oedipus I saw the words "inside" used 3 times. First by Tiresias, "The truth with all its power lives inside me." (405). Second by Oedipus, "what envy lurks inside you!" (435). Third by the chorus, "But the heart inside me sickens, dies as the land dies" (739). And once there was a mention by Oedipus about appearance under the skin, "what a handsome prince you raised--under the skin, what sickness to the core" (1528-1529). In these quotes there seems to be a division between a person's feelings expressed on their outside and inside self. This can be seen through the first 3 quotes. The first one associates "truth" with the inside, the second associates "envy" and the third uses "heart" and "sickens". So what can be seen is that the inside self holds more power than the outside. Tiresias has the ability to tell the truth but he rather hold it within him than to let the power and sadness spread outwards. Similarly, Oedipus accuses Tiresias of holding envy within him to show that he has the intentions of hurting others but does not openly show it. And the chorus references their inside as being sick to show the pain and suffering they receive from watching their land die out.
The Wild Duck uses this motif a few times as well. The first can be seen in the first act when Gregers and Hjalmar speak to each other:
GREGERS: Yes, you do, the outer man hasn't suffered.
HJALMAR: (in a gloomier tone). Ah, but the inner man! Believe me, he has a different look. You know, of course, what misery we've been through, I and my family, since the last time the two of us met. (122).
This scene adds to the themes of deceit and disguise that is used in the book. What we see is that Hjalmar presents himself as the same man that Gregers once remembered as the young vibrant man. However, Hjalmar openly admits that this is a disguise as he says "but the inner man[...]he has a different look". This also adds to Hjalmar's character by showing how he is trying to display himself as better than what he is.
The inner self can also show a cover up of different qualities. Gregers speaks of Gina by saying, "But she, too, surely, in the depths of her being, has something authentic, something sincere" (186). So we see this division between an inner personality and an outer one. In this quote we see Gregers accuse Gina of living a fake lifestyle filled with lies but he says that she still has "something authentic" that can be found "in the depths of her being". This is significant because it shows that there is this idea that every person has a different personality within them and what they portray themselves. This idea is present throughout the book as we see Gregers accuse more people of living an unfaithful life.
Relling also uses this motif of inner and outer. He states to Gregers towards the end of the play, "That's an inside look at him [Hjalmar], this idol you're groveling in front of. [...] you always have to have something to admire that's outside of yourself" (202). By saying this Relling is pointing out the flaws in Gregers by saying that he worships people "outside" of himself and that there is a different person "inside" of Hjalmar. Through this we see that Gregers creates a disguise of other people by seeing them as higher than what they are. There is also the division between a person is seen as and what their "inside" self is like. Through this we see that how one portrays oneself or is perceived is different than the amount they can tolerate inside of themselves.
Through the symbols of inside and outside in the two plays we see that there is a division between an inside personality and an outer one. Therefore, throughout these plays we see how there is a difference between how one portrays him/herself and how one is perceived by themselves. This is important because throughout the two plays there is this sense that there is deceit between the characters and lies drive the conflicts that come about.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Wild Duck Journal #4
Prompt: Compare how writers in your study have explored the themes of judgment and punishment, or disguise and deceit, or love and friendship, and with what effect.
In Oedipus and Wild Duck they both incorporate the theme of disguise and deceit in their plays. Through disguise and deceit in Oedipus we see that the truth is not always the wanted option. In the beginning of the play Tiresias tells Oedipus the truth, "You're blind to the corruption of your life, to the house you live in, those you live with--who are your parents?" (183). Tiresias displays the deceit that Oedipus is living in by questioning his past and saying "who are your parents." He also uses the word "blind" to show that Oedipus is not aware of the deceit he is living in. Through this quote Tiresias reveals the unwanted truth that Oedipus does not want to hear. This quote also reveals the stubbornness of Oedipus. After Tiresias speaks Oedipus responds by saying, "Get out--faster, back where you came from--vanish!" (183). By using strong words such as "get out" and "vanish", Oedipus shows his inability to reason with Tiresias. Instead of finding out where this accusation is coming from Oedipus jumps to the conclusion that Tiresias is lying. Through this we see that the play uses deceit and disguise to show a person's inability to accept the truth but instead to continue living in their disguise.
On the contrary, in Wild Duck, Hjalmar accepts the truth that Gregers gives and shows that he is more willing to accept that his life has been covered by disguise and deceit. Additionally, Hjalmar confronts the deceit rather than trying to fight against it. This can be seen when he confronts Gina, "Is it true--can it possibly be that--that there was some kind of involvement between you and Mr. Werle while you were in service there?" (182). By speaking to Gina, Hjalmar shows a quality that is not shown in Oedipus. It is the quality to listen and accept what others say instead of trying to create a different answer to his problems. Therefore, the theme that can be seen in Wild Duck is that one should question instead of living in a deceitful life. Gregers supports this statement by stating, "And I've had a chance to see at close range what such a marriage [one filled with deceit] can destroy in two people" (186). Through this quote, we see that Gregers believes that living in deceit "can destroy" a marriage and thus living in a truthful marriage is the only way to go. Therefore, this is his motivation to tell Hjalmar that Gina has not always been faithful to Hjalmar.
The effect that deceit and disguise is used in both plays is that it creates a conflict within the characters. It also allows the reader to question whether or not they should believe in the statements that are being thrown around. In Oediups, we see through disguise and deceit the amount of pride in Oedipus and his inability to face the truth. On the other hand, Wild Duck shows that one should question the statements are being made. Regardless, both plays, in the end, realize the truth and negative consequences arise from this.
In Oedipus and Wild Duck they both incorporate the theme of disguise and deceit in their plays. Through disguise and deceit in Oedipus we see that the truth is not always the wanted option. In the beginning of the play Tiresias tells Oedipus the truth, "You're blind to the corruption of your life, to the house you live in, those you live with--who are your parents?" (183). Tiresias displays the deceit that Oedipus is living in by questioning his past and saying "who are your parents." He also uses the word "blind" to show that Oedipus is not aware of the deceit he is living in. Through this quote Tiresias reveals the unwanted truth that Oedipus does not want to hear. This quote also reveals the stubbornness of Oedipus. After Tiresias speaks Oedipus responds by saying, "Get out--faster, back where you came from--vanish!" (183). By using strong words such as "get out" and "vanish", Oedipus shows his inability to reason with Tiresias. Instead of finding out where this accusation is coming from Oedipus jumps to the conclusion that Tiresias is lying. Through this we see that the play uses deceit and disguise to show a person's inability to accept the truth but instead to continue living in their disguise.
On the contrary, in Wild Duck, Hjalmar accepts the truth that Gregers gives and shows that he is more willing to accept that his life has been covered by disguise and deceit. Additionally, Hjalmar confronts the deceit rather than trying to fight against it. This can be seen when he confronts Gina, "Is it true--can it possibly be that--that there was some kind of involvement between you and Mr. Werle while you were in service there?" (182). By speaking to Gina, Hjalmar shows a quality that is not shown in Oedipus. It is the quality to listen and accept what others say instead of trying to create a different answer to his problems. Therefore, the theme that can be seen in Wild Duck is that one should question instead of living in a deceitful life. Gregers supports this statement by stating, "And I've had a chance to see at close range what such a marriage [one filled with deceit] can destroy in two people" (186). Through this quote, we see that Gregers believes that living in deceit "can destroy" a marriage and thus living in a truthful marriage is the only way to go. Therefore, this is his motivation to tell Hjalmar that Gina has not always been faithful to Hjalmar.
The effect that deceit and disguise is used in both plays is that it creates a conflict within the characters. It also allows the reader to question whether or not they should believe in the statements that are being thrown around. In Oediups, we see through disguise and deceit the amount of pride in Oedipus and his inability to face the truth. On the other hand, Wild Duck shows that one should question the statements are being made. Regardless, both plays, in the end, realize the truth and negative consequences arise from this.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Wild Duck Journal #3
Prompt: Reactions to specific situations by characters
Point of view: Hjalmar after the walk with Gregers
Can you imagine losing everything you have ever known? My whole life is a lie. Gregers has shown that all my fortunes; the roof above my head, the food I eat, have come from that Old Werle. What more can Gina have hid from me? How could she be so unfaithful. I feel heartbroken. I thought we had the strongest of marriages and now I find out that it is all a lie. I do not know if I should be thankful to finally know the truth or angered by the fact that I have been living a lie for the past 15 years. I am more than angered. I am furious and now I have a large debt hanging above my head. From this point on I have to repay the old man. I no longer have meaning in my life; I must do what is right and cut my ties from him. To further my anger, I now have to ponder if my wife is even my wife. She could still very much be with the Old Werle at this very moment. It is as if I no longer have a home. It is not my home; it is the Old Werle’s. However, no matter how angered and upset I am, I must think of Hedvig. Is she still my daughter? Regardless, this walk has shown me that she is the only truthful person that I know. Her and I are one. Everyone else is just a lie in my eyes. I no longer know what is truth. All I know is that I must work and show that I am capable of taking care of myself. I will filter this anger into my work. I will work feverishly and pay off every penny and never see that Old Werle ever again. This is the life that I am forced to live from now on. I will be in control of everything, this is the only way for me to know what is the truth. As for Gina, I do not know if I can even look at her again. How could she do this to me?
Point of view: Hjalmar after the walk with Gregers
Can you imagine losing everything you have ever known? My whole life is a lie. Gregers has shown that all my fortunes; the roof above my head, the food I eat, have come from that Old Werle. What more can Gina have hid from me? How could she be so unfaithful. I feel heartbroken. I thought we had the strongest of marriages and now I find out that it is all a lie. I do not know if I should be thankful to finally know the truth or angered by the fact that I have been living a lie for the past 15 years. I am more than angered. I am furious and now I have a large debt hanging above my head. From this point on I have to repay the old man. I no longer have meaning in my life; I must do what is right and cut my ties from him. To further my anger, I now have to ponder if my wife is even my wife. She could still very much be with the Old Werle at this very moment. It is as if I no longer have a home. It is not my home; it is the Old Werle’s. However, no matter how angered and upset I am, I must think of Hedvig. Is she still my daughter? Regardless, this walk has shown me that she is the only truthful person that I know. Her and I are one. Everyone else is just a lie in my eyes. I no longer know what is truth. All I know is that I must work and show that I am capable of taking care of myself. I will filter this anger into my work. I will work feverishly and pay off every penny and never see that Old Werle ever again. This is the life that I am forced to live from now on. I will be in control of everything, this is the only way for me to know what is the truth. As for Gina, I do not know if I can even look at her again. How could she do this to me?
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Wild Duck Journal #2
Prompt: "Visual action can be as important on the stage as speech." How far do you agree with this claim? In your answer you should refer to two or three plays you have studied.
Visual action is more prominent in the Wild Duck than it is in the play Oedipus. During the time of Oedipus sets were not created. There was only one backdrop and a few furnishings. To further the plot in Oedipus, the chorus was used to foreshadow the coming events. Therefore, Oedipus focused more on speech rather than Visual action. Additionally, the suicide of Jocasta and Oedipus' removing his eyes were not seen. These acts were known through the Messenger who gave a monologue explaining the events that had taken place. Also, there were few stage directions or actions that the characters were to do. However, the few directions that are given do enhance our understanding and are important to the stage. For example, on page 221 when the messenger states that he was the servant of Laius the stage direction states, "Jocasta turns sharply." These simple words give us a clue as to when Jocasta realized that the prophecy is true and that Oedipus is her son. So though visual action is not used heavily in Oedipus it is as important as speech.
On the contrary, the Wild Duck focuses a lot more on visual action. There are multiple stage directions that help the audience understand the characters. An example is the difference in stage between the Werle family and the Ekdal's. Also, there are more emotions being shown in the play that require visual action to allow the audience to know what is going on. One example of this is when Hedvig receives the menu as a gift from her father. In the scene it shows that she was "swallowing her tears." These actions can only be shown through acting rather than a speech.
Therefore, I believe visual action is sometimes more important than speech. Through visual action we can see the emotions that the characters are trying to express and can help us further understand the plot of the book.
Visual action is more prominent in the Wild Duck than it is in the play Oedipus. During the time of Oedipus sets were not created. There was only one backdrop and a few furnishings. To further the plot in Oedipus, the chorus was used to foreshadow the coming events. Therefore, Oedipus focused more on speech rather than Visual action. Additionally, the suicide of Jocasta and Oedipus' removing his eyes were not seen. These acts were known through the Messenger who gave a monologue explaining the events that had taken place. Also, there were few stage directions or actions that the characters were to do. However, the few directions that are given do enhance our understanding and are important to the stage. For example, on page 221 when the messenger states that he was the servant of Laius the stage direction states, "Jocasta turns sharply." These simple words give us a clue as to when Jocasta realized that the prophecy is true and that Oedipus is her son. So though visual action is not used heavily in Oedipus it is as important as speech.
On the contrary, the Wild Duck focuses a lot more on visual action. There are multiple stage directions that help the audience understand the characters. An example is the difference in stage between the Werle family and the Ekdal's. Also, there are more emotions being shown in the play that require visual action to allow the audience to know what is going on. One example of this is when Hedvig receives the menu as a gift from her father. In the scene it shows that she was "swallowing her tears." These actions can only be shown through acting rather than a speech.
Therefore, I believe visual action is sometimes more important than speech. Through visual action we can see the emotions that the characters are trying to express and can help us further understand the plot of the book.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Wild Duck Journal #1
Prompt: Setting: This includes cultural as well as geographical and historical setting. What effect does the setting have on story, character, theme?
There is a contrast between the setting in Act I and Act II. Act I takes place in the Werle's House. It is described as, "A richly and comfortably furnished study, with bookcases and upholstered furniture...brightly lit by lamps and candelabra." (119). Additionally, there are multiple rooms and the scene opens up with a manservant and a hired waiter. Act II takes place in Hjalmar Ekdal's studio. The studio is described as, "The studio is simply but comfortably furnished and decorated...on the table is a lighted lamp with a shade; by the stove an old armchair. Photographic apparatus and equipment of various sorts are set up here and there in the room. At the left of the double doors stands a bookcase containing a few books..." (137). This change in setting can show the different social classes that these two families are in. The Werle's house is much more furnished and shows the wealth that the Werle family has. On the contrary, Ekdal's studio is less furnished and crowded with stuff. This connects with the story because Old Ekdal had all his fortune torn away from him since the scandal. Therefore, the poor furnished studio shows the effect of the scandal on the family. There is also a lack of food in the Ekdal's household. Act II opens up with Hedvig and Gina speaking about the money strains and how hungry Hedvig is. Whereas, there is a banquet at the Werle's household with excess food.
Furthermore, the setting change connects to the motif of blindness. Since the Ekdal family is living in a much more darker home, there is this sense that they cannot see what is going on. Like the plot of the book, there are many unknown truths that will be soon revealed. For example, there maybe an affair between Gina and Hakon Werle. This is unknown to Hjalmar and thus he is living in the dark.
There is also a connection to the theme of improving one self. Hjalmar is set on restoring his family's name. So the setting in his studio illustrates how low he's starting at and the Werle's House serves as what he wishes to achieve.
There is a contrast between the setting in Act I and Act II. Act I takes place in the Werle's House. It is described as, "A richly and comfortably furnished study, with bookcases and upholstered furniture...brightly lit by lamps and candelabra." (119). Additionally, there are multiple rooms and the scene opens up with a manservant and a hired waiter. Act II takes place in Hjalmar Ekdal's studio. The studio is described as, "The studio is simply but comfortably furnished and decorated...on the table is a lighted lamp with a shade; by the stove an old armchair. Photographic apparatus and equipment of various sorts are set up here and there in the room. At the left of the double doors stands a bookcase containing a few books..." (137). This change in setting can show the different social classes that these two families are in. The Werle's house is much more furnished and shows the wealth that the Werle family has. On the contrary, Ekdal's studio is less furnished and crowded with stuff. This connects with the story because Old Ekdal had all his fortune torn away from him since the scandal. Therefore, the poor furnished studio shows the effect of the scandal on the family. There is also a lack of food in the Ekdal's household. Act II opens up with Hedvig and Gina speaking about the money strains and how hungry Hedvig is. Whereas, there is a banquet at the Werle's household with excess food.
Furthermore, the setting change connects to the motif of blindness. Since the Ekdal family is living in a much more darker home, there is this sense that they cannot see what is going on. Like the plot of the book, there are many unknown truths that will be soon revealed. For example, there maybe an affair between Gina and Hakon Werle. This is unknown to Hjalmar and thus he is living in the dark.
There is also a connection to the theme of improving one self. Hjalmar is set on restoring his family's name. So the setting in his studio illustrates how low he's starting at and the Werle's House serves as what he wishes to achieve.
Monday, May 10, 2010
Oedipus Question #2
Defend Oedipus' choice in blinding himself. Why was blinding himself better than any other outcome?
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Oedipus Journal #4
Prompt: Narrative structure: How has the plot (not the story) been constructed? Are there parts? Is the plot circular? Subplots? How important/effective is the ending? Has everything been revealed by the end or are there unanswered questions? Does this matter? What period of time has been covered? Is time important?
How has the plot been constructed? The plot is constructed mostly through word of mouth. The chorus and the messenger provide a lot of the insight into what is happening in the book. There are no insights into the character's thoughts, we are only presented with what is said out loud.
Are there any parts? No, it is a play that moves from scene to scene but there's no clear stop or end.
Is the plot circular? Yes, the play starts with a clear problem and a clear message from the God: find and kill Laius' killer. By the end of the play, the killer is revealed.
Subplots? Partially. Oedipus' search for his biological parents occurs during the same time as the search for Laius' murderer.
How important/effective is the ending? The ending is very effective. There is a sense of irony in the play. Oedipus first learns that he was the killer of his own father by a blind prophet and now Oedipus is blind. The ending is important because it solves the problems that were originally asked in the beginning of the play.
Has everything been revealed by the end or are there unanswered questions? The main problems were solved, but Oedipus whereabouts are still unknown. It is revealed that he will be exiled but there's not clear place that is says he will go.
Does this matter? No, the main point of the novel was not where Oedipus ends but the fact that he was a great leader that lost all of his power.
What period of time has been covered? There was no clear amount of time covered but it did not feel like a lot of time passed between the beginning and end.
Is time important? No, I do not believe it was.
How has the plot been constructed? The plot is constructed mostly through word of mouth. The chorus and the messenger provide a lot of the insight into what is happening in the book. There are no insights into the character's thoughts, we are only presented with what is said out loud.
Are there any parts? No, it is a play that moves from scene to scene but there's no clear stop or end.
Is the plot circular? Yes, the play starts with a clear problem and a clear message from the God: find and kill Laius' killer. By the end of the play, the killer is revealed.
Subplots? Partially. Oedipus' search for his biological parents occurs during the same time as the search for Laius' murderer.
How important/effective is the ending? The ending is very effective. There is a sense of irony in the play. Oedipus first learns that he was the killer of his own father by a blind prophet and now Oedipus is blind. The ending is important because it solves the problems that were originally asked in the beginning of the play.
Has everything been revealed by the end or are there unanswered questions? The main problems were solved, but Oedipus whereabouts are still unknown. It is revealed that he will be exiled but there's not clear place that is says he will go.
Does this matter? No, the main point of the novel was not where Oedipus ends but the fact that he was a great leader that lost all of his power.
What period of time has been covered? There was no clear amount of time covered but it did not feel like a lot of time passed between the beginning and end.
Is time important? No, I do not believe it was.
Thursday, May 6, 2010
IOP Journal #5
Book: We
Topic: How the colors of we enhance the understanding of the book
Today's Focus: Organizing my thoughts so I can focus on what I will be presenting.
Presenting tool: As much as I have heard that power points are boring, I honestly cannot think of a more effective way to present this idea. However, I'm going to focus more on images rather than words. So the purpose of the power point is just to project the color that I will be speaking of. I'll refrain from using words as much as possible, hopefully this will let it be less 'boring'.
Rough Outline for my own personal reference:
I. Summary of Novel
Topic: How the colors of we enhance the understanding of the book
Today's Focus: Organizing my thoughts so I can focus on what I will be presenting.
Presenting tool: As much as I have heard that power points are boring, I honestly cannot think of a more effective way to present this idea. However, I'm going to focus more on images rather than words. So the purpose of the power point is just to project the color that I will be speaking of. I'll refrain from using words as much as possible, hopefully this will let it be less 'boring'.
Rough Outline for my own personal reference:
I. Summary of Novel
- I'll try to keep this short and to the point. I'll cover the plot, the main characters, and the ending.
II. Blue - Stability and Intelligence
- Basically covering what was said in the first journal entry. That D-503 begins to classify his world as "blue" and through the images that he presents he's showing how his society is structured and how he considers it stable and free of any problems.
III. Yellow - Warning, Confusion, Cowardliness
- How meeting I-330 and her yellow dress dress represents a warning that she may cause things to change.
- To seeing a yellow world which stands for hope/happiness. This shows a clear contrast. Though he's beginning to see things differently it's a different type of happiness than depicted by the color "blue". "Blue" indicates that things are stable, "yellow" doesn't mean stable but is above contentment.
- When he runs into the medical office describing a "yellow world" we see another contrast. This time it can be seen as D-503 feeling like a coward because he cannot fully understand what is happening to him and cannot take any action against his "sickness"
- Through yellow we can see a conflicting image, one with 3 different connotations that it can leave the reader feeling confused as to what the character is trying to feel/sense. Thus, we can see that D-503 is as confused as the reader.
- Can also show a progression from old life because yellow is a warm color it moves forward whereas blue recedes. So yellow dominates blue.
(Put blue and yellow together and you get...)
IV. Green - Renewal, rebirth, growth
- The Green Wall: A balance between the two worlds
- The outside world: Shows a rebirth in his idea of his society. A renewal because everything is new to him. (I'm debating on whether or not to include the "inexperienced" analysis into this. I think it'll get a bit complicated and since I'm trying to focus on how D-503 world changes I don't think analyzing the people are as necessary.)
- Green against blue: Shows the death of something and the renewal of something else
(I'm considering mentioning: Though green signifies this new life. Zamyatin focuses a lot on how there's no finite. But in contrast, the novel states that there is an end. So this new life filled with green cannot be possible. And as it can be seen, things start to retract.)
V. D-503 Retracting
- He begins to notice some things that are yellow again. (This is another reference to his neighbor with the yellow wrinkles, something that I have not previously analyzed. I'm trying to keep this presentation simplistic so I don't end up confusing people. So I'm still trying to decide if adding another character will confuse or aid to the understanding of this novel.)
- He starts to describe things as "blue spasms" and this shows how his old life is seeping into his new one
- The blue cigarette. The last encounter with I-330, D-503 realizes that their relationship is over. That she was using him. She was smoking a cigarette that blew blue smoke. At the end of the chapter he ends up looking at this cigarette. From here, he decides to go to the Office of Guardians and confess of everything that has happened.
- He does end up going through the operation and returning to the mindset he once had.
VI. I-330 : A balance between white and black: life and death
- She is first described as with "white teeth" a sign of life.
- After going beyond the green wall her eyes/eyebrows are described as black, a sign of death
- All of this shows a contrast in I-330, though she's bringing life into this new world, she creates death among the old one.
Things that I'm contemplating on putting in or not:
1) O-99: Pink, a symbol of tenderness
- I'm considering taking this out due to time restraints. But because I find this connection so important: D-503 holds a different relationship with O-99. She's treated more tenderly like a child, just like what pink represents. This mother like quality later suggests her having a child.
2) The Operation
- While passing by the room D-503 describes it all as white. Too much white can signify blindness. So what this operation is doing is blinding or removing imagination from the people. It can also refer to cleanliness, like cleansing the mind from something bad. I would really like to include this in the presentation because I feel like it is a good connection but I don't see where it would fit.
3) S: He starts off as pink, just like how he's a guardian to D. He's not overpowering but a protector. Yet, at the end of the novel he turns red. So this is a more forceful color and shows a contrast between the protector of D-503 and the double agent that he is. I feel as if I shouldn't include him because he does not have a large part in the novel and it would take too much time to try to explain why his character exists to people who haven't read the book.
4) The Ancient House: Incorporates all the warm colors. This overflow of red, orange, and yellow shows how much energy is contained. Indicates that there's importance in the place, something that cannot be contained, and has significance that can dominate over the "blue" world.
5) The Benefactor: Is described as purple (meaning royalty) and white (purity, cleanliness). Again, I don't know where this would fit into the presentation.
There's just too many significant colors in this book, but I'm sure that once I get the main analysis written down, I'll see what is necessary to put in.
This concludes my 5 required journal entries. Hopefully, they appear detailed and well thought out.
II. Blue - Stability and Intelligence
- Basically covering what was said in the first journal entry. That D-503 begins to classify his world as "blue" and through the images that he presents he's showing how his society is structured and how he considers it stable and free of any problems.
III. Yellow - Warning, Confusion, Cowardliness
- How meeting I-330 and her yellow dress dress represents a warning that she may cause things to change.
- To seeing a yellow world which stands for hope/happiness. This shows a clear contrast. Though he's beginning to see things differently it's a different type of happiness than depicted by the color "blue". "Blue" indicates that things are stable, "yellow" doesn't mean stable but is above contentment.
- When he runs into the medical office describing a "yellow world" we see another contrast. This time it can be seen as D-503 feeling like a coward because he cannot fully understand what is happening to him and cannot take any action against his "sickness"
- Through yellow we can see a conflicting image, one with 3 different connotations that it can leave the reader feeling confused as to what the character is trying to feel/sense. Thus, we can see that D-503 is as confused as the reader.
- Can also show a progression from old life because yellow is a warm color it moves forward whereas blue recedes. So yellow dominates blue.
(Put blue and yellow together and you get...)
IV. Green - Renewal, rebirth, growth
- The Green Wall: A balance between the two worlds
- The outside world: Shows a rebirth in his idea of his society. A renewal because everything is new to him. (I'm debating on whether or not to include the "inexperienced" analysis into this. I think it'll get a bit complicated and since I'm trying to focus on how D-503 world changes I don't think analyzing the people are as necessary.)
- Green against blue: Shows the death of something and the renewal of something else
(I'm considering mentioning: Though green signifies this new life. Zamyatin focuses a lot on how there's no finite. But in contrast, the novel states that there is an end. So this new life filled with green cannot be possible. And as it can be seen, things start to retract.)
V. D-503 Retracting
- He begins to notice some things that are yellow again. (This is another reference to his neighbor with the yellow wrinkles, something that I have not previously analyzed. I'm trying to keep this presentation simplistic so I don't end up confusing people. So I'm still trying to decide if adding another character will confuse or aid to the understanding of this novel.)
- He starts to describe things as "blue spasms" and this shows how his old life is seeping into his new one
- The blue cigarette. The last encounter with I-330, D-503 realizes that their relationship is over. That she was using him. She was smoking a cigarette that blew blue smoke. At the end of the chapter he ends up looking at this cigarette. From here, he decides to go to the Office of Guardians and confess of everything that has happened.
- He does end up going through the operation and returning to the mindset he once had.
VI. I-330 : A balance between white and black: life and death
- She is first described as with "white teeth" a sign of life.
- After going beyond the green wall her eyes/eyebrows are described as black, a sign of death
- All of this shows a contrast in I-330, though she's bringing life into this new world, she creates death among the old one.
Things that I'm contemplating on putting in or not:
1) O-99: Pink, a symbol of tenderness
- I'm considering taking this out due to time restraints. But because I find this connection so important: D-503 holds a different relationship with O-99. She's treated more tenderly like a child, just like what pink represents. This mother like quality later suggests her having a child.
2) The Operation
- While passing by the room D-503 describes it all as white. Too much white can signify blindness. So what this operation is doing is blinding or removing imagination from the people. It can also refer to cleanliness, like cleansing the mind from something bad. I would really like to include this in the presentation because I feel like it is a good connection but I don't see where it would fit.
3) S: He starts off as pink, just like how he's a guardian to D. He's not overpowering but a protector. Yet, at the end of the novel he turns red. So this is a more forceful color and shows a contrast between the protector of D-503 and the double agent that he is. I feel as if I shouldn't include him because he does not have a large part in the novel and it would take too much time to try to explain why his character exists to people who haven't read the book.
4) The Ancient House: Incorporates all the warm colors. This overflow of red, orange, and yellow shows how much energy is contained. Indicates that there's importance in the place, something that cannot be contained, and has significance that can dominate over the "blue" world.
5) The Benefactor: Is described as purple (meaning royalty) and white (purity, cleanliness). Again, I don't know where this would fit into the presentation.
There's just too many significant colors in this book, but I'm sure that once I get the main analysis written down, I'll see what is necessary to put in.
This concludes my 5 required journal entries. Hopefully, they appear detailed and well thought out.
Oedipus Journal #3
Type of Journal: Creative
Prompt: Diary entries from any of the characters
Point of view: Jocasta when she is about to give Oedipus away
Appalling news from the Gods. My son, my son of my own flesh and blood, is destined to kill his own parents. The same parents that are sure to nurture him, raise him, and give him all that this world desires. How can this be true? I hold this baby boy in my arms and I cannot envision him turning against his own mother! The citizens of the town have sentenced this defenseless baby to death. Laius, his own father, cannot even look at his own son. And yet throughout this ordeal, the boy still smiles in his sleep. Does he not realize that the world he was introduced to is the same world that he's being taken away from? Does he not see that the faces that use to smile down on him are the ones that cannot even stand to look at him? I cannot imagine what would drive this innocent being to commit such revolting crimes. Yet, a part of me believes it is possible. A part of me fears that my own blood will commit crimes against his own kind. A part of me knows that the Gods never lie. Laius speaks the truth. If my son commits these crimes, he is not my son. He is a threat to our country. Anyone who threatens this country is to be banished and destroyed. They must take my child away. Tomorrow, I cannot bear to even think of it. I will not wake, I will not think, I will call for the Shepherd to take him away, and I will rid this child from my mind. The Gods never lie. A prophecy is a prophecy. And this child is destined to pain, suffering, and death. And I pray to God that I am doing the right thing.
Prompt: Diary entries from any of the characters
Point of view: Jocasta when she is about to give Oedipus away
Appalling news from the Gods. My son, my son of my own flesh and blood, is destined to kill his own parents. The same parents that are sure to nurture him, raise him, and give him all that this world desires. How can this be true? I hold this baby boy in my arms and I cannot envision him turning against his own mother! The citizens of the town have sentenced this defenseless baby to death. Laius, his own father, cannot even look at his own son. And yet throughout this ordeal, the boy still smiles in his sleep. Does he not realize that the world he was introduced to is the same world that he's being taken away from? Does he not see that the faces that use to smile down on him are the ones that cannot even stand to look at him? I cannot imagine what would drive this innocent being to commit such revolting crimes. Yet, a part of me believes it is possible. A part of me fears that my own blood will commit crimes against his own kind. A part of me knows that the Gods never lie. Laius speaks the truth. If my son commits these crimes, he is not my son. He is a threat to our country. Anyone who threatens this country is to be banished and destroyed. They must take my child away. Tomorrow, I cannot bear to even think of it. I will not wake, I will not think, I will call for the Shepherd to take him away, and I will rid this child from my mind. The Gods never lie. A prophecy is a prophecy. And this child is destined to pain, suffering, and death. And I pray to God that I am doing the right thing.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
IOP Journal #4
Book: We
Topic: How the colors in We we enhance the understanding of the novel.
Today's focus: quick update on blue, and green.
Forgive me for not analyzing these passages deeply, but for the sake of time (and mostly for me to not forget) I'm just going to quickly summarize these three passages:
“Pieces of blue walls and towers tumble from above, grow larger with terrifying speed, but they must still fly hours—perhaps days—through infinity.” (pg 172)
“Icy-blue, the Integral shimmered, sparkled.” (pg 181)
“I clearly see the blue, watery veins and nodes...but all of this is quite apart from me...” (pg 188)
These all show that the society that he once considered perfect no longer exists. It is all coming down, far away, ect. As for the Integral, "ice" gives it a negative connotation similar to death. It's no longer close, thus like the other passages there's a clear division between his old life and new.
Green: signifies life, growth, freshness, renewal, health, safety, and environment. On the negative side it can suggest jealousy and inexperience. Since it is partially a warm and cool colors it can show balance, harmony, and stability. Green with blue suggests nature with can denote new beginnings and growth.
Green Wall: Why green? Well, not only does it signify safety in that the people are contained in their 'perfect' society, it also suggests that something new is outside. Thus you have this wall that is the balance, the middle, between the structured society and the outside, mysterious, world.
D-503 finally makes it outside the Green Wall. In this outside world it is described that there's more green. The trees, mold, ect, “...not a firm, level surface, but something revoltingly soft, yielding, springy, green, alive.” (pg 155). The word alive is used to describe this new world as well as the color green. D-503 is growing in that he's experiencing this new society with different ideas. They're the renewal of the society; something new and refreshing from the same old lifestyle. Additionally, they are inexperienced. Some are dressed in fur and they don't have the experience to really take over the One State. I-330 ends up giving a speech and says, "the day has come when we shall break down the Wall—all walls—to let the green wind blow free from end to end—across the earth" (pg 157). Though she's encouraging to break down the one divider (balance) between the new worlds, the "green wind" is referring to a new life. She wants to bring in these fresh ideas into the same old world and thus start a revolution, a growth in their society. And another from D-503, “Sun, heads, a green serrated line against the blue...” (pg 158). So what is seen is that green is taking over the color blue. According to the definition above when green is accompanied by blue, this signifies new beginnings and growth. So if blue represents his old life and green is this new society, the connection can be made that the two worlds have collided and with it new outcomes are to come. The green is breaking apart the old society and together they will create a new 'color'.
I'm aware that my analysis wasn't very detailed/clear. Hopefully it'll sound better when I actually present it.
Topic: How the colors in We we enhance the understanding of the novel.
Today's focus: quick update on blue, and green.
Forgive me for not analyzing these passages deeply, but for the sake of time (and mostly for me to not forget) I'm just going to quickly summarize these three passages:
“Pieces of blue walls and towers tumble from above, grow larger with terrifying speed, but they must still fly hours—perhaps days—through infinity.” (pg 172)
“Icy-blue, the Integral shimmered, sparkled.” (pg 181)
“I clearly see the blue, watery veins and nodes...but all of this is quite apart from me...” (pg 188)
These all show that the society that he once considered perfect no longer exists. It is all coming down, far away, ect. As for the Integral, "ice" gives it a negative connotation similar to death. It's no longer close, thus like the other passages there's a clear division between his old life and new.
Green: signifies life, growth, freshness, renewal, health, safety, and environment. On the negative side it can suggest jealousy and inexperience. Since it is partially a warm and cool colors it can show balance, harmony, and stability. Green with blue suggests nature with can denote new beginnings and growth.
Green Wall: Why green? Well, not only does it signify safety in that the people are contained in their 'perfect' society, it also suggests that something new is outside. Thus you have this wall that is the balance, the middle, between the structured society and the outside, mysterious, world.
D-503 finally makes it outside the Green Wall. In this outside world it is described that there's more green. The trees, mold, ect, “...not a firm, level surface, but something revoltingly soft, yielding, springy, green, alive.” (pg 155). The word alive is used to describe this new world as well as the color green. D-503 is growing in that he's experiencing this new society with different ideas. They're the renewal of the society; something new and refreshing from the same old lifestyle. Additionally, they are inexperienced. Some are dressed in fur and they don't have the experience to really take over the One State. I-330 ends up giving a speech and says, "the day has come when we shall break down the Wall—all walls—to let the green wind blow free from end to end—across the earth" (pg 157). Though she's encouraging to break down the one divider (balance) between the new worlds, the "green wind" is referring to a new life. She wants to bring in these fresh ideas into the same old world and thus start a revolution, a growth in their society. And another from D-503, “Sun, heads, a green serrated line against the blue...” (pg 158). So what is seen is that green is taking over the color blue. According to the definition above when green is accompanied by blue, this signifies new beginnings and growth. So if blue represents his old life and green is this new society, the connection can be made that the two worlds have collided and with it new outcomes are to come. The green is breaking apart the old society and together they will create a new 'color'.
I'm aware that my analysis wasn't very detailed/clear. Hopefully it'll sound better when I actually present it.
Oedipus Journal #2
Prompt: How does the background information on Greek Theater and History inform your reading of Oedipus? Use specific examples to explore the connections between context and content.
The first obvious connection between the background information and Oedipus is that the play circles around some god. Or at least references some god. Thus, there would be an alter on state. Also, there is a lot of emphasis that the god knows what's best and is the answer to the city's problems. In Oedipus the god Apollo is mentioned throughout the reading. And in the description of the scene "a stone alter stands at the center of stage." Together, the people are turning to the god Apollo and Oedipus in hopes that he'll answer the god's oracle and save the town. There is also some connection to nature. In the play the land is described as:
"Thebes is dying. A blight on the fresh crops
and the rich pastures, cattle sicken and die,
and the women die in labor, children stillborn,
and the plague, the fiery god of fever hurls down
on the city, his lightning slashing through us--" (pg 160).
During the festivals of Dionysus, the season would affect the type of play. For example during the winter there would be plays about death of the land which would also affect the mood/standpoint of the god. So in this passage the town is withering away. The place is filled with death and destruction. Along with this scene, it is shown that Apollo is angry and wants justice. So to reverse the "plague", the citizens needs to please Apollo and fulfill his wish.
In a way, Sophocles does show "man as he should be." In that Oedipus is like any ordinary man besides the fact that he solved the riddle of the Sphinx. Therefore, the reader is not expected to see Oedipus be able to save the city by himself. Instead we see Oedipus turn to the gods for help and admits that he needs help in solving this problem.
A third connection is that Sophocles was the play writer who introduced a 3rd character. This reduced the use of the chorus. However, the chorus was still important because they would represent the thoughts of the people and provide some information about what was going to happen next. In Oedipus there are clearly multiple characters. Additionally, there are parts where the chorus interacts with the characters (which previously it had not). For example, when Jocasta is introduced there is a scene where the chorus is acting as the people and Oedipus is questioning the chorus as to whether or not they want him banished from the land.
The first obvious connection between the background information and Oedipus is that the play circles around some god. Or at least references some god. Thus, there would be an alter on state. Also, there is a lot of emphasis that the god knows what's best and is the answer to the city's problems. In Oedipus the god Apollo is mentioned throughout the reading. And in the description of the scene "a stone alter stands at the center of stage." Together, the people are turning to the god Apollo and Oedipus in hopes that he'll answer the god's oracle and save the town. There is also some connection to nature. In the play the land is described as:
"Thebes is dying. A blight on the fresh crops
and the rich pastures, cattle sicken and die,
and the women die in labor, children stillborn,
and the plague, the fiery god of fever hurls down
on the city, his lightning slashing through us--" (pg 160).
During the festivals of Dionysus, the season would affect the type of play. For example during the winter there would be plays about death of the land which would also affect the mood/standpoint of the god. So in this passage the town is withering away. The place is filled with death and destruction. Along with this scene, it is shown that Apollo is angry and wants justice. So to reverse the "plague", the citizens needs to please Apollo and fulfill his wish.
In a way, Sophocles does show "man as he should be." In that Oedipus is like any ordinary man besides the fact that he solved the riddle of the Sphinx. Therefore, the reader is not expected to see Oedipus be able to save the city by himself. Instead we see Oedipus turn to the gods for help and admits that he needs help in solving this problem.
A third connection is that Sophocles was the play writer who introduced a 3rd character. This reduced the use of the chorus. However, the chorus was still important because they would represent the thoughts of the people and provide some information about what was going to happen next. In Oedipus there are clearly multiple characters. Additionally, there are parts where the chorus interacts with the characters (which previously it had not). For example, when Jocasta is introduced there is a scene where the chorus is acting as the people and Oedipus is questioning the chorus as to whether or not they want him banished from the land.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
IOP Journal #3
Book: We
Topic: How the colors in the book affect the understanding of the novel.
Today's focus: Pink, a little brown, and an update of blue.
First, I will admit that I did not mark up many/any pink references beforehand because I did not think they would end up being significant. After rereading one of the chapters, I realized I was wrong. So looking back here's how pink has been applied in the book.
1) Pink coupons: The way that the characters express their like towards each other- privately of course
2) O-99 is sometimes referred to as "rosy" or "pink" colored
3) The mysterious S is referred to as "pink wing-ears"
4) U is mentioned as pinkish-brown
What pink can imply: Large amounts of pink can create physical weakness in people. Can denote love, romantic and charming. Romance, love, friendship, feminine qualities, passiveness, and tenderness.
What does this all mean?
1) Pink coupons: I would like to think that this connection is pretty self evident. But for the sake of showing that I can make connections to things, I will say that "love" "romance" and "physical weakness" can all relate to how pink coupons cause D-503 act like a Romeo. In other words, he gets very excited when he gets the chance to make love with I-330, for the most part, use to be O-99.
2)O-99: What we have to realize is that O-99 is a very soft, reserved character. Therefore, pink describes her well. She's passive, tender, and to D-503 it's not a relationship where he's constantly thinking of having sex with her, but more of a caring relationship. He breaks up with her knowing that it is the right reason and because of this pink emphasizes this thoughtful feeling.
3) S: To start off I would like to make the connection that "wing-ear" could refer to his physical characteristics and the fact that D-503 calls S his "Guardian Angel". As for pink, the same concept with O-99 can be applied. D-503 does not have an intense relationship for S, but he admires S. Pink gives the connotations that S is actually trying to protect and help D-503, not stalking him or trying to kill him off. Now what changed my mind about the color pink was when S saves D-503 from being taken away for jumping out towards another girl, "I saw nearby, swinging his pink ear-wings, gliding over the mirror-smooth pavement, a huge, familiar head...'It is my duty to inform you that Number D-503 is ill and incapable of controlling his emotions." (pg 127). This protection shows that S maybe D's guardian angel despite the fact that in previous chapters D-503 was trying to escape and hide from S. S being described as pink should have foreshadowed to this event.
4) U: Considering the fact that I don't remember much of the story the first time I read this book, I cannot remember how U ends up in the end of the book. So I'll just focus on what has happened since I started rereading the book. U is beginning to show feelings towards D-503, but in my mind it's more of a motherly quality. So pink is implying more of a friendship/motherly love. She's trying to protect D-503, trying to direct him in the correct path. Brown, "represents steadfastness, simplicity, friendliness, dependability, and health" So what can be implied is that U is someone who is loyal to her society and wants to spread his stability to D-503. Not forcefully but in a tender manner, like how a mother tends to a child. Additionally, "Brown conveys a feeling of warmth, honesty, and wholesomeness". Again the U gives off the impression that she is loyal to her society, she's not forcing her beliefs on others, but simply telling what she believes is true and hoping that D-503 will see it her way.
Update on blue:
After unanimity day, D-503 is reminded of how his society is still intact after the scare of the Mephis rejecting the Benefactor. Then D-503 writes, "And I no longer have the strange sensation that I am lost...And it's no longer surprising that I see the blue sky, the round sun." (pg 149). We can conclude that blue represents the perfect society that D-503 use to admire. And at this point in the novel he starts to go back to what he use to believe. So what we have seen is that he starts with a blue world, changes to yellow, and is partially back to blue. Blue + yellow = green. As a bit of a preview, I'm thinking the next color will be green.
As a side note for myself: D-503 did previously compare blue and ice. I believe this is one of the few times that blue is used as an obvious depressing color. Thus keep this in mind and look into it sometime later.
Topic: How the colors in the book affect the understanding of the novel.
Today's focus: Pink, a little brown, and an update of blue.
First, I will admit that I did not mark up many/any pink references beforehand because I did not think they would end up being significant. After rereading one of the chapters, I realized I was wrong. So looking back here's how pink has been applied in the book.
1) Pink coupons: The way that the characters express their like towards each other- privately of course
2) O-99 is sometimes referred to as "rosy" or "pink" colored
3) The mysterious S is referred to as "pink wing-ears"
4) U is mentioned as pinkish-brown
What pink can imply: Large amounts of pink can create physical weakness in people. Can denote love, romantic and charming. Romance, love, friendship, feminine qualities, passiveness, and tenderness.
What does this all mean?
1) Pink coupons: I would like to think that this connection is pretty self evident. But for the sake of showing that I can make connections to things, I will say that "love" "romance" and "physical weakness" can all relate to how pink coupons cause D-503 act like a Romeo. In other words, he gets very excited when he gets the chance to make love with I-330, for the most part, use to be O-99.
2)O-99: What we have to realize is that O-99 is a very soft, reserved character. Therefore, pink describes her well. She's passive, tender, and to D-503 it's not a relationship where he's constantly thinking of having sex with her, but more of a caring relationship. He breaks up with her knowing that it is the right reason and because of this pink emphasizes this thoughtful feeling.
3) S: To start off I would like to make the connection that "wing-ear" could refer to his physical characteristics and the fact that D-503 calls S his "Guardian Angel". As for pink, the same concept with O-99 can be applied. D-503 does not have an intense relationship for S, but he admires S. Pink gives the connotations that S is actually trying to protect and help D-503, not stalking him or trying to kill him off. Now what changed my mind about the color pink was when S saves D-503 from being taken away for jumping out towards another girl, "I saw nearby, swinging his pink ear-wings, gliding over the mirror-smooth pavement, a huge, familiar head...'It is my duty to inform you that Number D-503 is ill and incapable of controlling his emotions." (pg 127). This protection shows that S maybe D's guardian angel despite the fact that in previous chapters D-503 was trying to escape and hide from S. S being described as pink should have foreshadowed to this event.
4) U: Considering the fact that I don't remember much of the story the first time I read this book, I cannot remember how U ends up in the end of the book. So I'll just focus on what has happened since I started rereading the book. U is beginning to show feelings towards D-503, but in my mind it's more of a motherly quality. So pink is implying more of a friendship/motherly love. She's trying to protect D-503, trying to direct him in the correct path. Brown, "represents steadfastness, simplicity, friendliness, dependability, and health" So what can be implied is that U is someone who is loyal to her society and wants to spread his stability to D-503. Not forcefully but in a tender manner, like how a mother tends to a child. Additionally, "Brown conveys a feeling of warmth, honesty, and wholesomeness". Again the U gives off the impression that she is loyal to her society, she's not forcing her beliefs on others, but simply telling what she believes is true and hoping that D-503 will see it her way.
Update on blue:
After unanimity day, D-503 is reminded of how his society is still intact after the scare of the Mephis rejecting the Benefactor. Then D-503 writes, "And I no longer have the strange sensation that I am lost...And it's no longer surprising that I see the blue sky, the round sun." (pg 149). We can conclude that blue represents the perfect society that D-503 use to admire. And at this point in the novel he starts to go back to what he use to believe. So what we have seen is that he starts with a blue world, changes to yellow, and is partially back to blue. Blue + yellow = green. As a bit of a preview, I'm thinking the next color will be green.
As a side note for myself: D-503 did previously compare blue and ice. I believe this is one of the few times that blue is used as an obvious depressing color. Thus keep this in mind and look into it sometime later.
Oedipus Journal #1
Type of Journal: Comparison
Prompt: Readers are attracted to moments of intensity in a writer's work. By what means and with what effect have writers in your study offered heightened emotional moments designed to arrest the reader's attention?
During the first few pages of Oedipus, a tense atmosphere is created. The story begins right when the plot unfolds, therefore the reader is pouring over the pages waiting to see what is going to happen. Therefore, for a work to attract readers by moments of intensity a problem must arise that causes the reader to question where the plot is going. To do so the writer needs to create a problem that is shocking and angers the characters. In Oedipus this is seen first by the description of the setting of Thebes:
"A blight on the fresh crops
and the rich pastures, cattle sicken and die,
and the women die in labor, children stillborn,
and the plague, the fiery god of fever hurls down" (pg 160).
A scene is clearly created that shows the devastation of the city. The reader can picture the death and destruction that has been created by this "plague". The effect that this has is that it causes the reader to want to know more. The reader begins to question when the problem started, why, and for how long. Though this attracts a reader's attention, the heightened emotional moments do not begin until towards the end of the required reading that we were suppose to do today. There, Tiresias accuses Oedipus of the murder of Laius, "I say you are the murderer you hunt" (pg 180). In here we see the problem that has occurred; Oedipus is being accused of murder. This is both shocking because Oedipus is depicted as a high, powerful, and respected being yet there is no reason for the reader not to believe in this statement. Therefore, the reader is drawn into this mystery of believing what is described in the beginning of the book or believing this statement that another well respected being has presented. However, the reading ends with another shocking revelation from Tiresias:
"you're blind to the corruption of your life,
to the house you live in, those you live with--
who are your parents? Do you know?" (pg 183).
Again, another accusation is made that causes the reader to question where the plot is going. The reader begins to speculate what is happening, who is involved and as these questions arise the intensity is created that captures the reader's attention. In this passage we see that Tiresias is extending his accusation to Oedipus family. He's drawing in the reader by showing the flaws in a well respected character.
Likewise, this same intensity has been created in other works. Take for example, The Crucible. In this play, the story starts out with a clear problem. Abigail is sick and quickly the plot starts to show that witchcraft maybe the cause of the sickness. So like Oedipus the story jumps right into a problem that causes the reader to question what is going to happen next. Then the reader must question if the problem is likely to happen; is witchcraft a likely reason to her sickness? If not then what would Abigail be hiding? Another similarity is that accusations begin to emerge. Therefore, by the end of the first chapter a problem and mystery is presented that causes the reader to want to continue to read to solve the problem given, or in the case of Oedipus; a riddle.
Summary of the answer to prompt: The mean is that a problem/mystery is created. This problem incorporates something that leaves questions unanswered while causing the reader to question him/herself. This is seen by the accusations that are given in Oedipus and the Crucible. With the problem and the accusations a tense atmosphere is created because the characters in the books are also questioning the outcome of the accusations. The effect is that the reader sympathizes for the characters or begins to come up with his/her own theories of what will happen. Either way, the reader's attention is drawn into the novel and begins to have emotional attachments to the characters or the story.
Prompt: Readers are attracted to moments of intensity in a writer's work. By what means and with what effect have writers in your study offered heightened emotional moments designed to arrest the reader's attention?
During the first few pages of Oedipus, a tense atmosphere is created. The story begins right when the plot unfolds, therefore the reader is pouring over the pages waiting to see what is going to happen. Therefore, for a work to attract readers by moments of intensity a problem must arise that causes the reader to question where the plot is going. To do so the writer needs to create a problem that is shocking and angers the characters. In Oedipus this is seen first by the description of the setting of Thebes:
"A blight on the fresh crops
and the rich pastures, cattle sicken and die,
and the women die in labor, children stillborn,
and the plague, the fiery god of fever hurls down" (pg 160).
A scene is clearly created that shows the devastation of the city. The reader can picture the death and destruction that has been created by this "plague". The effect that this has is that it causes the reader to want to know more. The reader begins to question when the problem started, why, and for how long. Though this attracts a reader's attention, the heightened emotional moments do not begin until towards the end of the required reading that we were suppose to do today. There, Tiresias accuses Oedipus of the murder of Laius, "I say you are the murderer you hunt" (pg 180). In here we see the problem that has occurred; Oedipus is being accused of murder. This is both shocking because Oedipus is depicted as a high, powerful, and respected being yet there is no reason for the reader not to believe in this statement. Therefore, the reader is drawn into this mystery of believing what is described in the beginning of the book or believing this statement that another well respected being has presented. However, the reading ends with another shocking revelation from Tiresias:
"you're blind to the corruption of your life,
to the house you live in, those you live with--
who are your parents? Do you know?" (pg 183).
Again, another accusation is made that causes the reader to question where the plot is going. The reader begins to speculate what is happening, who is involved and as these questions arise the intensity is created that captures the reader's attention. In this passage we see that Tiresias is extending his accusation to Oedipus family. He's drawing in the reader by showing the flaws in a well respected character.
Likewise, this same intensity has been created in other works. Take for example, The Crucible. In this play, the story starts out with a clear problem. Abigail is sick and quickly the plot starts to show that witchcraft maybe the cause of the sickness. So like Oedipus the story jumps right into a problem that causes the reader to question what is going to happen next. Then the reader must question if the problem is likely to happen; is witchcraft a likely reason to her sickness? If not then what would Abigail be hiding? Another similarity is that accusations begin to emerge. Therefore, by the end of the first chapter a problem and mystery is presented that causes the reader to want to continue to read to solve the problem given, or in the case of Oedipus; a riddle.
Summary of the answer to prompt: The mean is that a problem/mystery is created. This problem incorporates something that leaves questions unanswered while causing the reader to question him/herself. This is seen by the accusations that are given in Oedipus and the Crucible. With the problem and the accusations a tense atmosphere is created because the characters in the books are also questioning the outcome of the accusations. The effect is that the reader sympathizes for the characters or begins to come up with his/her own theories of what will happen. Either way, the reader's attention is drawn into the novel and begins to have emotional attachments to the characters or the story.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
IOP Journal #2
Book: We
Topic: How the colors of We affect the understanding of the novel
Today's focus: I-330 and the color yellow
Meaning of yellow:
Yellow has conflicting symbolism that can vary throughout different regions.
Positive connotations consist of: happiness, joy, cheerfulness, hope, sunshine, intellect, energy, honor, and loyalty.
Negative connotations consist of: unstable, spontaneous, when placed against black the combination is used as a warning, cowardice, deceit, and jealousy.
During the first outing with I-330, she brings D-503 to the Ancient House and then changes into a yellow dress, "She wore a short, old, vivid yellow dress, a black hat, black stockings." (pg 28). From the definition above, the yellow and black contrast is the first warning for D-503. This warns the reader that I-330 is not like the other citizens and a danger to the order of society.
This is not the only time she wore a yellow dress. In fact, when the ancients are mentioned yellow is the color that is usually shown, "She was in a light, saffron-yellow dress of the ancient model. This was a thousand times more cruel than if she had worn nothing." (pg 54). The ancients are looked down upon for not having the intelligence that is valued in the One State. So to associate the ancients with the color yellow emphasizes the idea that they are cowards who did not reach the potential as the current citizens. Also, it denotes instability which goes against D-503's mindset.
However, further into the novel a contrast occurs. After spending some more time with I-330, D-503's begins to see the world as yellow, "She flashed by, filling for a second the yellow, empty world" (pg 85). The word empty implies that D-503 is rethinking the world he is living in. I-330 fills his world with "yellow" which could imply that she represents happiness and hope. Therefore, we see the connotations of yellow move from negative to positive and with it a transformation within D-503 occurs.
D-503 begins to associate this color with his "sickness" as a result he goes to the Medical Office and states, "I rushed to him as to someone near and dear, mumbling about insomnia, dreams, shadows, a yellow world" (pg 89). It can be implied that he is dreaming/in a dream with the color yellow.
To dream about yellow:
The color yellow has both positive and negative connotations. If the dream is a pleasant one, then the color yellow is symbolic of intellect, energy, agility, happiness, harmony, and wisdom. On the other hand, if the dream is an unpleasant one, then the color represents cowardice and sickness. You may have a fear or an inability to make a decision or take action. As a result, you are experiencing many setbacks.
- http://dreammoods.com/cgibin/dreamdictionarysearch.pl?method=exact&header=dreamsymbol&search=yellow
Therefore, it can be seen that D-503 is feeling like a coward for not being able to stand up against I-330 but at the same time he's having troubles deciding what to do with the situation he is in. He is experiencing setbacks because he cannot think straight, his work is suffering, and he is confused as to what is wrong with him.
Topic: How the colors of We affect the understanding of the novel
Today's focus: I-330 and the color yellow
Meaning of yellow:
Yellow has conflicting symbolism that can vary throughout different regions.
Positive connotations consist of: happiness, joy, cheerfulness, hope, sunshine, intellect, energy, honor, and loyalty.
Negative connotations consist of: unstable, spontaneous, when placed against black the combination is used as a warning, cowardice, deceit, and jealousy.
During the first outing with I-330, she brings D-503 to the Ancient House and then changes into a yellow dress, "She wore a short, old, vivid yellow dress, a black hat, black stockings." (pg 28). From the definition above, the yellow and black contrast is the first warning for D-503. This warns the reader that I-330 is not like the other citizens and a danger to the order of society.
This is not the only time she wore a yellow dress. In fact, when the ancients are mentioned yellow is the color that is usually shown, "She was in a light, saffron-yellow dress of the ancient model. This was a thousand times more cruel than if she had worn nothing." (pg 54). The ancients are looked down upon for not having the intelligence that is valued in the One State. So to associate the ancients with the color yellow emphasizes the idea that they are cowards who did not reach the potential as the current citizens. Also, it denotes instability which goes against D-503's mindset.
However, further into the novel a contrast occurs. After spending some more time with I-330, D-503's begins to see the world as yellow, "She flashed by, filling for a second the yellow, empty world" (pg 85). The word empty implies that D-503 is rethinking the world he is living in. I-330 fills his world with "yellow" which could imply that she represents happiness and hope. Therefore, we see the connotations of yellow move from negative to positive and with it a transformation within D-503 occurs.
D-503 begins to associate this color with his "sickness" as a result he goes to the Medical Office and states, "I rushed to him as to someone near and dear, mumbling about insomnia, dreams, shadows, a yellow world" (pg 89). It can be implied that he is dreaming/in a dream with the color yellow.
To dream about yellow:
The color yellow has both positive and negative connotations. If the dream is a pleasant one, then the color yellow is symbolic of intellect, energy, agility, happiness, harmony, and wisdom. On the other hand, if the dream is an unpleasant one, then the color represents cowardice and sickness. You may have a fear or an inability to make a decision or take action. As a result, you are experiencing many setbacks.
- http://dreammoods.com/cgibin/dreamdictionarysearch.pl?method=exact&header=dreamsymbol&search=yellow
Therefore, it can be seen that D-503 is feeling like a coward for not being able to stand up against I-330 but at the same time he's having troubles deciding what to do with the situation he is in. He is experiencing setbacks because he cannot think straight, his work is suffering, and he is confused as to what is wrong with him.
Friday, April 30, 2010
IOP Journal #1
Book: We
Topic: How the colors in the book affect the understanding of what is happening.
The most prominent color in the second chapter (entry) in We is the color blue. According to Color Basics for Print and Web by Jacci Howard Bear, blue holds multiple meanings. First, the color blue is suppose to create a cool, calming effect that creates a tranquil mood. It is associated with consciousness and intellect. Therefore, things that are blue are said to symbolize "trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, stability, conservatism, faith, truth, and heaven."
The chapter opens up with D-503 praising the sky, "Blue, unblemished by a single cloud" (pg 3). By describing the scene as blue, D-503 is emphasizing what he considers a flawless society. This symbolism of blue is referring to how the society is built on mathematics and intelligence. Therefore, for the sky to be unblemished means that there is nothing hindering from the stability of the society. This illustrates D-503 loyalty to his society because the color blue shows that he puts faith in what his society is built upon. He has no "clouds" or doubts in his mind. Yevgeny most likely used this color to emphasize how ordered and loyal the citizens are to their society. This same idea is again illustrated on the next page when D-503 describes the scene as, "flooded with pale blue sunlight" (pg 4). Pale blue is associated more with calmness and tranquility. Sunlight can refer to spotlighting and emphasizing the structured society. Towards the end of the chapter, D-503 describes O-99 similarly to how he described the sky, "I kissed her lovely blue eyes, unshadowed by a single cloud..." (pg 9). Again, this emphasizes the faithfulness of the citizens to their society. O-99 is considered, in D-503's opinion, as someone who does not have any doubts (or clouds) about the society.
When the color blue is applied to clothing the meaning is slightly changed. The clothing in We is described as "pale blue unifs" (pg 5). Blue clothing is associated with importance and confidence. Therefore, the clothing gives the sense that each character holds significance to the One State. Additionally, since blue is a cool color it creates a calming effect that recedes. Thus, even though this color represents confidence, it also shows that the people are not the center of attention but part of the background of the society.
In total, the idea that blue can represent stability and unity is important. The society of the One State is very organized so for each person to wear this color shows the importance of structure and wholeness (The idea of We rather than individuality). I am interested in seeing if the connotation of this color will change throughout the novel, because as calming as blue maybe, too much blue is said to "dampen spirits" and create the feeling of "depression".
Topic: How the colors in the book affect the understanding of what is happening.
The most prominent color in the second chapter (entry) in We is the color blue. According to Color Basics for Print and Web by Jacci Howard Bear, blue holds multiple meanings. First, the color blue is suppose to create a cool, calming effect that creates a tranquil mood. It is associated with consciousness and intellect. Therefore, things that are blue are said to symbolize "trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, stability, conservatism, faith, truth, and heaven."
The chapter opens up with D-503 praising the sky, "Blue, unblemished by a single cloud" (pg 3). By describing the scene as blue, D-503 is emphasizing what he considers a flawless society. This symbolism of blue is referring to how the society is built on mathematics and intelligence. Therefore, for the sky to be unblemished means that there is nothing hindering from the stability of the society. This illustrates D-503 loyalty to his society because the color blue shows that he puts faith in what his society is built upon. He has no "clouds" or doubts in his mind. Yevgeny most likely used this color to emphasize how ordered and loyal the citizens are to their society. This same idea is again illustrated on the next page when D-503 describes the scene as, "flooded with pale blue sunlight" (pg 4). Pale blue is associated more with calmness and tranquility. Sunlight can refer to spotlighting and emphasizing the structured society. Towards the end of the chapter, D-503 describes O-99 similarly to how he described the sky, "I kissed her lovely blue eyes, unshadowed by a single cloud..." (pg 9). Again, this emphasizes the faithfulness of the citizens to their society. O-99 is considered, in D-503's opinion, as someone who does not have any doubts (or clouds) about the society.
When the color blue is applied to clothing the meaning is slightly changed. The clothing in We is described as "pale blue unifs" (pg 5). Blue clothing is associated with importance and confidence. Therefore, the clothing gives the sense that each character holds significance to the One State. Additionally, since blue is a cool color it creates a calming effect that recedes. Thus, even though this color represents confidence, it also shows that the people are not the center of attention but part of the background of the society.
In total, the idea that blue can represent stability and unity is important. The society of the One State is very organized so for each person to wear this color shows the importance of structure and wholeness (The idea of We rather than individuality). I am interested in seeing if the connotation of this color will change throughout the novel, because as calming as blue maybe, too much blue is said to "dampen spirits" and create the feeling of "depression".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)